Javascript is required to run this page
John Miller

John Miller

John Miller served in the State Senate from 2008 to 2016 (SD1).
Democrat

Voting Unity: Democratic Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does John Miller vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Democrats take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 03/03/2016 - Senate: Reconsideration of House amendments agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N)
    03/03/2016 - Senate: House amendments agreed to by Senate (33-Y 5-N 1-A)

    John Miller:
    Yes

  • 03/01/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (65-Y 29-N)
    03/03/2016 - Senate: House amendments agreed to by Senate (33-Y 6-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

  • 02/12/2016 - Senate: Constitutional reading dispensed (39-Y 0-N)
    02/12/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (36-Y 3-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/29/2016 - Senate: Read second time and engrossed
    02/01/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (31-Y 9-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/15/2016 - Senate: Passed by temporarily
    02/15/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (21-Y 18-N)

    John Miller:
    No

  • 02/05/2016 - Senate: Passed by for the day
    02/08/2016 - Senate: Read third time and defeated by Senate (16-Y 24-N)

    John Miller:
    No

Bill Details
  • 03/11/2016 - Conference: Amended by conference committee
    03/11/2016 - Senate: Conference report agreed to by Senate (39-Y 1-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

  • 03/04/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (99-Y 0-N)
    03/08/2016 - Senate: House amendment rejected by Senate (2-Y 38-N)

    John Miller:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/08/2016 - Senate: Passed by for the day
    02/09/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (22-Y 18-N)

    John Miller:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/01/2016 - Senate: Printed as engrossed 16101987D-E
    02/02/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (33-Y 7-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/07/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (96-Y 0-N)
    03/08/2016 - Senate: House amendments agreed to by Senate (35-Y 5-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/02/2016 - Senate: Read second time and engrossed
    02/03/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (34-Y 6-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/07/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (92-Y 4-N)
    03/08/2016 - Senate: House amendment agreed to by Senate (33-Y 6-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/08/2016 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB358S1
    02/09/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (32-Y 7-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.