Javascript is required to run this page
John Miller

John Miller

John Miller served in the State Senate from 2008 to 2016 (SD1).
Democrat

Voting Unity: Democratic Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does John Miller vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Democrats take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 03/11/2016 - House: VOTE: ADOPTION (89-Y 4-N)
    03/11/2016 - Senate: Conference report agreed to by Senate (25-Y 15-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

  • 03/03/2016 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute HB879S1
    03/03/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate with substitute (36-Y 4-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/02/2016 - Senate: Motion to reconsider stricken from the calendar agreed to (39-Y 0-N)
    03/02/2016 - Senate: Stricken from Senate calendar (38-Y 1-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

  • 02/25/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (33-Y 5-N)
    02/25/2016 - Senate: Reconsideration of Senate passage agreed to by Senate (39-Y 1-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/25/2016 - Senate: Read third time
    02/25/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (37-Y 3-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2016 - Senate: Reconsideration of Senate passage agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N)
    02/22/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (25-Y 14-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

  • 02/22/2016 - Senate: Read third time
    02/22/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (28-Y 12-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/02/2016 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate as amended
    03/02/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendment (39-Y 1-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/02/2016 - Senate: Read third time
    03/02/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (37-Y 3-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/02/2016 - Senate: Read third time
    03/02/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (36-Y 3-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/01/2016 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate as amended
    03/01/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendments (35-Y 3-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/29/2016 - Senate: Pending question ordered (31-Y 6-N 1-A)
    02/29/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate with amendments (24-Y 14-N)

    John Miller:
    No

  • 02/29/2016 - Senate: Committee amendments agreed to
    02/29/2016 - Senate: Pending question ordered (31-Y 6-N 1-A)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/23/2016 - Senate: Read third time
    02/23/2016 - Senate: Defeated by Senate (9-Y 30-N)

    John Miller:
    No

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.