Javascript is required to run this page
John Miller

John Miller

John Miller served in the State Senate from 2008 to 2016 (SD1).
Democrat

Voting Unity: Democratic Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does John Miller vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Democrats take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/05/2016 - Senate: Read second time and engrossed
    02/08/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (36-Y 4-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/04/2016 - Senate: Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
    02/04/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (27-Y 13-N)

    John Miller:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/10/2016 - Senate: Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
    02/10/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (25-Y 14-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/02/2016 - Senate: Reconsideration of passage agreed to by Senate (37-Y 0-N 1-A)
    02/02/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (22-Y 17-N)

    John Miller:
    No

  • 02/01/2016 - Senate: Read second time and engrossed
    02/02/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (23-Y 16-N)

    John Miller:
    No

Bill Details
  • 03/03/2016 - House: VOTE: BLOCK VOTE PASSAGE (98-Y 0-N)
    03/07/2016 - Senate: House substitute rejected by Senate (1-Y 39-N)

    John Miller:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/23/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (69-Y 31-N)
    02/25/2016 - Senate: House amendment agreed to by Senate (34-Y 6-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/12/2016 - Senate: Impact statement from DPB (SB645E)
    02/12/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (38-Y 1-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2016 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (80-Y 20-N)
    02/24/2016 - Senate: House substitute agreed to by Senate (31-Y 9-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

  • 02/05/2016 - Senate: Printed as engrossed 16103211D-E
    02/08/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (28-Y 10-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/09/2016 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB667S1
    02/10/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (23-Y 15-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/08/2016 - Senate: Reconsideration of passage agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N)
    02/08/2016 - Senate: Passed Senate (34-Y 5-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

  • 02/05/2016 - Senate: Read second time and engrossed
    02/08/2016 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (34-Y 5-N)

    John Miller:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.