Javascript is required to run this page
John O'Bannon

John O'Bannon

John O'Bannon III served in the House of Delegates from 2001 to 2018 (HD73).
Republican

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does John O'Bannon vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House (84-Y 12-N)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (84-Y 12-N)

    John O'Bannon:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/15/2017 - House: Passed House (93-Y 6-N)
    02/15/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (93-Y 6-N)

    John O'Bannon:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2017 - House: Passed House with amendment (58-Y 40-N)
    02/22/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (58-Y 40-N)

    John O'Bannon:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/23/2017 - House: Passed House with amendment (99-Y 1-N)
    02/23/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (99-Y 1-N)

    John O'Bannon:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/22/2017 - House: Passed House with amendments (67-Y 32-N)
    02/22/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (67-Y 32-N)

    John O'Bannon:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/15/2017 - House: Passed House (92-Y 5-N 1-A)
    02/15/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (92-Y 5-N 1-A)

    John O'Bannon:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/15/2017 - House: VOTE: AGREE TO MOTION (97-Y 0-N)
    02/15/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (81-Y 13-N)

    John O'Bannon:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House with amendment (91-Y 2-N 2-A)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (91-Y 2-N 2-A)

    John O'Bannon:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House (85-Y 9-N 2-A)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (85-Y 9-N 2-A)

    John O'Bannon:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/21/2017 - House: Passed House (87-Y 7-N 2-A)
    02/21/2017 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (87-Y 7-N 2-A)

    John O'Bannon:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.