Javascript is required to run this page
Mark Peake

Mark Peake

Mark Peake has served in the State Senate since 2017.
Republican
Currently represents State Senate District 8

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Mark Peake vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 01/23/2026 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate (Voice Vote)
    01/26/2026 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (22-Y 16-N 0-A)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/13/2026 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate as amended (Voice Vote)
    02/16/2026 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (21-Y 17-N 0-A)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/02/2026 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute (Voice Vote)
    02/03/2026 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (22-Y 17-N 0-A)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/13/2026 - House: Agreed to by House with amendment (93-Y 0-N 0-A)
    02/17/2026 - Senate: House amendments agreed to by Senate (22-Y 18-N 0-A)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/21/2026 - Senate: Committee substitute agreed to (Voice Vote)
    01/22/2026 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (34-Y 5-N 0-A)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 01/20/2026 - Senate: Read second time
    01/21/2026 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (26-Y 14-N 0-A)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/11/2026 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute as amended (Voice Vote)
    02/12/2026 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (21-Y 18-N 1-A)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/16/2026 - Senate: Reconsideration of Passed by for the day agreed to (36-Y 0-N 0-A)
    02/16/2026 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (19-Y 17-N 0-A)

    Mark Peake:
    No

  • 02/16/2026 - Senate: Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (SB118)
    02/16/2026 - Senate: Read third time and defeated by Senate (19-Y 20-N 0-A)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/30/2026 - Senate: Read second time
    02/02/2026 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (23-Y 17-N 0-A)

    Mark Peake:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/13/2026 - Senate: Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute (Voice Vote)
    02/16/2026 - Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (34-Y 4-N 0-A)

    Mark Peake:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.