Javascript is required to run this page
Lee Ware

Lee Ware

Lee Ware has served in the House of Delegates since 1998.
Republican
Currently represents House of Delegates District 72

Voting Unity: Republican Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Lee Ware vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Republicans take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/10/2026 - House: Moved from Uncontested Calendar to Regular Calendar
    02/10/2026 - House: Read third time and passed House (94-Y 3-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/26/2026 - Senate: Passed Senate with substitute (21-Y 19-N 0-A)
    03/02/2026 - House: Senate substitute agreed to by House (66-Y 33-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    No

  • 01/28/2026 - House: Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (HB25)
    01/28/2026 - House: Read third time and passed House (65-Y 31-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/16/2026 - House: Engrossed by House - committee substitute
    02/17/2026 - House: Read third time and passed House (63-Y 34-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/12/2026 - House: Engrossed by House as amended
    02/12/2026 - House: Agreed to by House (92-Y 4-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/09/2026 - House: Read second time
    02/09/2026 - House: Uncontested Appropriations Committee Amendments agreed to (90-Y 7-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/26/2026 - House: Floor Amendment Item 109 #1h offered by Delegate McNamara passed by (64-Y 33-N 0-A)
    02/26/2026 - House: Floor Amendment Item 3-5.24 #1h offered by Delegate Webert passed by (73-Y 22-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    No

  • 02/26/2026 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 471 #5h agreed to (95-Y 2-N 0-A)
    02/26/2026 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 491 #1h agreed to (64-Y 32-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    No

  • 02/26/2026 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 471 #4h agreed to (64-Y 33-N 0-A)
    02/26/2026 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 471 #5h agreed to (95-Y 2-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    Yes

  • 02/26/2026 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 420 #3h agreed to (64-Y 33-N 0-A)
    02/26/2026 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 471 #1h agreed to (65-Y 32-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    No

  • 02/26/2026 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 352 #1h agreed to (63-Y 33-N 0-A)
    02/26/2026 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 352 #3h agreed to (66-Y 31-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    No

  • 02/26/2026 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 290 #1h agreed to (64-Y 32-N 0-A)
    02/26/2026 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 328 #1h agreed to (91-Y 5-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    Yes

  • 02/26/2026 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 243 #1h agreed to (63-Y 33-N 0-A)
    02/26/2026 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 278 #3h agreed to (92-Y 5-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    Yes

  • 02/26/2026 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 102 #6h agreed to (64-Y 33-N 0-A)
    02/26/2026 - House: Contested committee amendment Item 125 #1h agreed to (95-Y 1-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    Yes

  • 02/26/2026 - House: Read second time
    02/26/2026 - House: Uncontested committee amendments agreed to (89-Y 9-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 03/09/2026 - Senate: Passed Senate with substitute (26-Y 14-N 0-A)
    03/10/2026 - House: Senate substitute agreed to by House (67-Y 31-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    No

  • 02/04/2026 - House: Engrossed by House as amended
    02/05/2026 - House: Read third time and passed House (64-Y 33-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/30/2026 - House: Engrossed by House
    01/30/2026 - House: Agreed to by House (68-Y 25-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/11/2026 - House: Engrossed by House as amended
    02/12/2026 - House: Read third time and passed House (66-Y 31-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/26/2026 - House: Read second time and engrossed
    01/27/2026 - House: Read third time and passed House (68-Y 31-N 0-A)

    Lee Ware:
    No

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.