Javascript is required to run this page
Matthew James

Matthew James

Matthew James served in the House of Delegates from 2010 to 2019 (HD80).
Democrat

Voting Unity: Democratic Caucus

Select Year:
Issue Filter:

How often does Matthew James vote with the party when at least two-thirds of other Democrats take the same position?

With Caucus
Other

  • 02/19/2019 - House: Passed House (95-Y 3-N)
    02/19/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (95-Y 3-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/13/2019 - House: Passed House (84-Y 13-N)
    02/13/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (84-Y 13-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/19/2019 - House: Defeated by House (44-Y 46-N)
    02/19/2019 - House: VOTE: DEFEATED (44-Y 46-N)

    Matthew James:
    No

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2019 - House: Passed House with substitute (57-Y 42-N)
    02/20/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (57-Y 42-N)

    Matthew James:
    No

Bill Details
  • 01/28/2019 - House: Passed House (83-Y 16-N)
    01/28/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (83-Y 16-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/13/2019 - House: Passed House (96-Y 1-N)
    02/13/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (96-Y 1-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/15/2019 - House: Passed House (92-Y 3-N)
    02/15/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (92-Y 3-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/20/2019 - House: Passed House with amendment (70-Y 29-N)
    02/20/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (70-Y 29-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/19/2019 - House: Passed House (95-Y 4-N)
    02/19/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE #2 (95-Y 4-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

  • 02/19/2019 - House: Passed House (94-Y 4-N)
    02/19/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (94-Y 4-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details
  • 02/15/2019 - House: Passed House (93-Y 2-N)
    02/15/2019 - House: VOTE: PASSAGE (93-Y 2-N)

    Matthew James:
    Yes

Bill Details

VPAP's unity score should not be interpreted as a partisan litmus test. For instance, Republicans who more often split from caucus does not necessarily mean they are less conservative than peers. It could mean they are more conservative. A nuanced reading of bills involved is needed to reach any conclusions.